Before Tinubu is crucified

Before Tinubu is crucified

Thursday, June 25, 2015 7:37 pm


 By Remi Oyeyemi

 

“Even among thieves, there is honour.” – Professor Wole Soyinka

 
“Though, force can protect in emergency, only justice, fairness and cooperation can finally lead men to the dawn of eternal peace.”

–         Dwight D. Eisenhower

 
“No matter who or what you support, I believe in supporting fairness first.” –  Jennette McCurdy

•Tinubu: the man they want to crucify

•Tinubu: the man they want to crucify

In recent weeks, I have been watching the way and manner that Asiwaju Ahmed Bola Tinubu is being tossed around by his beneficiaries. I have been watching in consternation, though not surprisingly, how he is being schemed out of the House of Mohammadu Buhari that he has toiled to help build. I am watching how suddenly he is the leper that everyone must run away from now that the food is cooked. I am aghast at the ingratitude of politicians and their cruelty. I am appalled at the crass opportunism pervading the air.

 Yes, people often have tried to divorce integrity and honour from politics. People have tried to create a gulf between morality and politics. People have always tried to excuse treachery and perfidy as inseparable concomitants of politics. People have justified dishonor and shamelessness as ingredients of politics. There have been efforts since the days of yore to justify immorality, lack of honour, dishonesty, unreliability, subversion as fundamental tenets of politics. I believe all the above are just means to excuse irresponsibility on the part of politics and those who practice the trade. It is why people believe and say that “Politics is a dirty game.”

Niccolo Machiavelli, the Italian diplomat during the Renaissance era gave intellectual wings to this anomaly with his book The Prince  published in 1532. He had espoused the obnoxious idea in which political expediency is placed above morality. He had noxiously advocated the use of craft and deceit to maintain authority. In short Machiavellianism is “the employment of cunning and duplicity in statecraft or in general conduct.”

But the Great Chief Obafemi Awolowo fervently disagrees with this heinous school of thought about politics. He posited that politics is not dirty a game, it is those who play politics that make it dirty. In a lecture given on January 27, 1961 titled “Politics and Religion”  in Ilishan Remo, the Great Awo contended “the description of politics as a game is a felicitous one,” and insisted that “any game at all, other than a game of chance, is good. But the manner of playing it may be clean or dirty, all depending on whether or not the players observe the rules for playing the game which mankind has laid down in conformity with universally accepted standards of decency and ethics.”

The above postulation by the Great Awo underscored why he was the type of politician that he was and why he was enormously successful as well as why History has held him up as primus inter pares.Buhari and his handlers would be well advised to scout through history and see how any government that adopted Machiavellianism as opposed to Awoism has ever ended. They should educate themselves and make up their minds which of the two philosophies of politics they want to adopt.

Obeying the rules of the game such as politics as Great Awo posited is functionally related to “honour” that Professor Soyinka apotheosized on an occasion at the Great Oduduwa Hall, in Great Ife in 1982, as being fundamental “even among thieves.”  Thus, I am assuming that Buhari is an “honourable man.” I am also assuming that his handlers are decent and ethical. It is based on these assumptions that I know it is inescapable for Buhari and his handlers not to give adequate and commensurate space to Tinubu’s influence in this administration. Not to give Tinubu his dues would amount to perfidy and a betrayal of the highest order. It would amount to dishonor among the “thieves” in the APC. It would also suggest that Buhari and his men are indecent, unethical and treacherous.

I find it weird that suddenly, Tinubu “is too controlling.” “He wants to impose all of the time.” “He is too ambitious.” “He is not good for Buhari’s Presidency.” “Buhari will do well to stay away from him.” “Tinubu must be neutralized.” “Tinubu is corrupt.” ”Tinubu is selfish.” “Is Tinubu the only one in the APC?” “Why must he seek to exert influence in Buhari’s Administration?” “Tinubu is too powerful.” “Tinubu should leave Buhari alone.” “Tinubu is not the only one who contributed to Buhari’s success.” Tinubu this, Tinubu that!

Well, Tinubu may not be the only one who contributed to Buhari’s success, but he is the ACE.  He was and still is the most important variable in the success of Buhari in the last election. Remove Tinubu from the equation, Buhari’s last effort would have been more woeful than the previous efforts. How come people have such a short memory? Have some people been in Russia not to know what transpired? Or they are just being in denial because they lack the capacity to be fair to Tinubu? Do we have to like Tinubu to be fair to him? As Jennette McCurdy insisted above, “no matter who or what” anyone of us supports, “supporting fairness first” should be the first order of business.

How can people forget so soon that Buhari has been running for President for 12 years and has been failing very woefully until Tinubu comes to his rescue? Where were all those making noises about Tinubu wanting to exert influence? What is wrong in expecting to reap the fruit of your labour as Tinubu is seeking to do by having some of his supporters and men in the Buhari House that he was the architect of?

Those blaming Tinubu, if they are not ingrates and hypocrites, didn’t they know that Tinubu was corrupt when he was toiling to put the coalition together? Didn’t they know that he was always imposing candidates when they were all running after him to help them install Buhari as the President? Didn’t they know that he always wanted to put his own supporters in position of power when he was sweating to make Buhari successful? How come it is now that they are just realizing that Tinubu is an undesirable element?

Now, all these ingrates and hypocrites are shouting the names of Babatunde Fashola, Kayode Fayemi and the rest of them. Have they forgotten that there would not have been any of them on the political stage if not for Tinubu? Give it to Tinubu, he knows how to put square pegs in square holes. Or has everyone forgotten that the tragedy of Goodluck Ebele Jonathan was foisted on Nigeria by Mattew Aremu Okikiola Olusegun Obasanjo-Onyejekwe? How come Tinubu is suddenly bad and has to be ostracized from the Buhari House that would not and  could not have stood if not for Tinubu?

I am not a politician. But I am seriously interested in politics because it affects me on daily basis.  I am not a supporter of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu school of politics. I am not fond of his political philosophy. I have criticized him several times in the public space. I have a lot of beef with him with the way he has conducted a lot of things. All this has not blinded and would not blind me to the fact that he is entitled to the fruit of his labour. There is just no other way to slice it.

Though, Tinubu put himself in this predicament because he did not heed the warnings given to him regarding a lot of things by some elders in Yoruba land. He believed he saw something that some of us did not see. He was committed beyond commitment. He was dedicated, determined and focused. He put everything he had into making Buhari successful. He hurt a lot of his own people as a result. He made enemies out of his “extended family members.” He gave everything. To deny him now what is due to him would be utterly unfair.  What is fair is just fair. What is right is just right.

It is true that Mohammadu Buhari is now the president. Now he has the power. But he would be advised to be cautious on the way and manner he treats Tinubu, regardless of his (Tinubu’s) imperfections. Tinubu may not be one hundred percent accepted in Yoruba land. Chief M. K.O Abiola was not either. Same goes with Great Awo.  But it would be a very terrible mistake to judge him based on that.  Buhari would be well advised that it would be in his best interest and the interest of Nigeria not to ostracize Tinubu. Not at this time or anytime in the life of this administration. Buhari’s failure to hearken to this advice would have a lot of ramifications for the fortunes and future of this country.

It is my hope that Buhari and his handlers would not make the same mistake that Ibrahim Babangida made with Chief M. K. O. Abiola. I hope Buhari would not repeat the mistake of his good friend in General Sani Abacha. It is my hope that they would not miscalculate and take decisions that would put this country in jeopardy. It is my hope that Buhari and his handlers would not be ungrateful. It is my hope that Tinubu would not be denied his fair share of influence in this administration. If there is anything that the Yoruba man hates, it is unfairness, even against strangers or detractors, not to talk of one of their own, regardless how recalcitrant s/he is.

It is too late in the day to just realize that Tinubu is not good. It is too late in the day to want to discard him and undercut him. It is too late in the day to look for excuses to ostracize him after he has helped put the government in power. Regardless of the way it is sliced, without Tinubu, there could never have been any Buhari presidency. Not Alhaji Abubakar Atiku, and certainly not Senator Bukola Saraki or any of the crass opportunists circling around Buhari presently could have made it happen.

As Jennette McCurdy preached, no matter who or what you support, “supporting fairness first” is the best way forward. Expecting a modicum of decency and ethics in the conduct of our politicians regardless of their imperfections is nothing too much to expect. Even, among thieves, there should be honour a la Professor Wole Soyinka.

“In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility – I welcome it.”
– John F. Kennedy, in his Inaugural Address January 20, 1961.
naugural Address January 20, 1961

Please follow me on Twitter @OyeyemiRemi


Join The Conversation

5 Comments

  • Kulie says:

    No one but Tinumbu is ostracizing Tinubu! He played a prominent role along with OTHERS.
    He was awarded the VP and host of impending ministerial position. Trying to control the Legislative branch as well is something even Buhari is reluctant to do. Tinumbu controls
    less than 6 states. He can only survive National politics by “supporting fairness first”. That is the best way forward.
    This has nothing to do with IBB who did the right thing with Abiola; nor that of Abacha’s actions. Tinumbu should stop playing God or be ostracize.

  • mac2001 says:

    He who has ears, let him listen, as a particular African adage puts it..

  • Lateef says:

    This is well written, and it appeals to my belief. I think Mr. President has gone overboard. Someone told me I should not expect anything. That he is ordinary. Nothing is extra-ordinary about him.

  • Chief says:

    I really hope someone quite intelligent amongst the handlers of Buhari will tell them the truth early enough before it is too late.Just two steps so far is causing problems already. Tinubu can not be crucified at this time. It is too dangerous for the whole nation. However this will serve as a very serious lesson for Tinubu as well.

  • olayinka says:

    Hmmmm nice advice.

  • What do you think?

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.