Ex-acting NIMASA DG, others, get new trial date

Ex-acting NIMASA DG, others, get new trial date

Monday, November 21, 2016 1:00 pm


Haruna Jauro, former acting DG for NIMASA: charged with theft

Haruna Jauro, former acting DG for NIMASA: charged with theft

A Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday fixed Dec. 13 for the continuation of trial of a former acting Director General of NIMASA, Haruna Jauro, alongside others, facing a N304.1 million fraud charge.

Jauro, who assumed leadership of the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) in acting capacity in July 2015, is charged by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

He is standing trial alongside Dauda Bawa and Thlumbau Enterprises Ltd on 19 counts, bordering on the offences.

They were arraigned on April 12, and had pleaded not guilty to the charge, while the court had admitted them to bail in the sum of N5 million each, with two sureties each in like sum.

The suit, which was scheduled for continuation of trial, was stalled on Monday, following the absence of the trial judge, Justice Mojisola Olatoregun.

No reason was given for her absence.

The prosecution and defence counsels were present in court, and the trial is now fixed for Dec. 13.

At the last adjourned date on Oct. 24, the defence counsel had informed the court of his client’s intention to enter into a plea bargain with the EFCC.

This position was also confirmed by the prosecutor, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo, who told the court that the accused had approached the anti-graft agency to explore a bargain option.

The court had then adjourned the suit for a report on the process.

Jauro assumed leadership of NIMASA, after an erstwhile Director General of the agency,  Patrick Akpobolokemi, who is also being prosecuted alongside others, for an alleged multi-billion naira fraud.

The EFCC accused Jauro and others of conspiring among themselves to defraud NIMASA to the tune of N304.1m between January 2014 and September 2015.

The anti-graft agency alleged that the accused converted the sum to their own use.

The prosecution told the court that the offence contravened the provisions of Section 15(1) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) (Amendment) Act, 2012. (NAN)
UNS/PIO/PIO


Join The Conversation

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.