My opposition to secession–Zik

My opposition to secession–Zik

Sunday, June 25, 2017 8:28 pm


Nnamdi Azikiwe

 

By Nnamdi Azikiwe

When the 1954 constitution conference started, my good friend, Chief Obafemi Awolowo tabled a motion to the effect that in the new constitution, provision should be made that any state which feels like seceding should do so. I was opposed to it and said ‘no’ and said that once we have a federation, we are indivisible and perpetual.

That was when we began to use that expression – ‘The Indivisibility and perpetuity of the federation’ – and that to secede would amount to treason. And so, a debate ensued.

The Secretary of State then was Oliver Littleton, later Lord Chandos and he was very much interested and that was his first time in saying that the people of African descent were people actually debating at a high level.

So a full day was given to Chief Awolowo to make his points. He spoke brilliantly as a lawyer. He made his points why secession should be incorporated in the constitution. He cited the case of the Soviet Union which is a federation, and that secession is written there so that any state in the Soviet Union can secede at will. He also cited the case of Western Australia and eventually he finished his case and was applauded.

Lord Chandos said that on the face of the arguments before him it would be suicidal to incorporate secession in our constitution and that is why we have section 86 in our constitution that if any region or state should secede, then it will be an act of treason

We adjourned. The next day, I had to reply. I availed myself of the opportunity to, well, demolish the arguments of my friend and I cited the case of United States which based its constitution on that of the Swiss Confederation. That is Switzerland. I pointed out a case, I think, that of Texas versus White, where Mr. Salmon Chase, the Chief Justice laid down the principle – he was really an arbiter – that the union was intended to be perpetual and indivisible and that any attempt to divide the union by secession was treasonable.

Also read Why Awolowo did not make West secede

The North (NPC) supported Action Group. The question was then: Should we have secession? The Colonial Office came to our rescue. You know, the usual principle of Britain – ‘divide and rule’ (laughs) but this time, it was in our favour. So, the colonial office backed us.

Lord Chandos said that on the face of the arguments before him it would be suicidal to incorporate secession in our constitution and that is why we have section 86 in our constitution that if any region or state should secede, then it will be an act of treason and that was what led to this war, because Col. Ojukwu seceded and so violated the constitution.

— Excerpt: Nnamdi Azikiwe’s interview with New Nigeria in 1975

Shared through here: https://www.facebook.com/Senator-Babafemi-Ojudu-174263625967883/?hc_ref=PAGES_TIMELINE&fref=nf on 22 June 2017

Loading...

Join The Conversation

7 Comments

  • […] Nnamdi Azikiwe fought against the secession clause proposal for the future Nigeria constitution. https://www.thenewsnigeria.com.ng/2017/06/my-opposition-to-secession-zik/ It should be noted that there were many Igbo members of the parliament in which Azikiwe fought […]

    • Uche says:

      You quote Azikiwe when it suits you and when it suits you, you bash him for accepting to be a mere figurehead and going into alliance with North instead accepting Awolowo’s offer of political alliance to form the independent government. I am curious to find out which constitution did Ojukwu violate?,Is it the same constitution which military suspended and was no longer operational when they stole power? Or was there any constitution in place when Ojukwu declared South east independence

  • Leave a Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.